I'm trying to figure out how to give a case study or an example when...I barely remember how I revised even my MOST RECENT book due to brain ooze. But I think it could be fun!
I would be interested in a revision seminar as well. I'm sure you must have a system that works for you, and it would be interesting to see how you do it. Also, what are your thoughts on using online tools like Grammarly as a proofreader?
I've never used online tools to proofread. I've always been particularly good at grammar-- generally speaking; that's not to say I never have errors in my work-- so I think I always just trust myself to eventually find issues if I have the time to let myself rest between reading drafts. I also think that those kinds of tools are imperfect because they leave no room for voice or colloquialisms or for, you know, those moments when a sentence "breaks the rules" but is actually clearer for it. I very much believe in the flexibility and adaptability of language!
That said, if a tool is helpful to you, you should use it. No one knows your needs the way you do. Just-- maybe don't take its word as law, that's all.
After using it for about a week, I agree with you. I’m about 5 chapters into my latest novel and I find it too restrictive. I end up refusing most of the suggestions, especially in dialogue sections. As far as it finding simple errors (spelling, missing word, etc) it is excellent. Thx for responding, have a good day.
A revision seminar would be pretty great!
I'm trying to figure out how to give a case study or an example when...I barely remember how I revised even my MOST RECENT book due to brain ooze. But I think it could be fun!
Thank you for your generosity. Would love a chat on revisions.
:)
Noted! Thank you.
I would be interested in a revision seminar as well. I'm sure you must have a system that works for you, and it would be interesting to see how you do it. Also, what are your thoughts on using online tools like Grammarly as a proofreader?
Noted! I'll keep thinking about it.
I've never used online tools to proofread. I've always been particularly good at grammar-- generally speaking; that's not to say I never have errors in my work-- so I think I always just trust myself to eventually find issues if I have the time to let myself rest between reading drafts. I also think that those kinds of tools are imperfect because they leave no room for voice or colloquialisms or for, you know, those moments when a sentence "breaks the rules" but is actually clearer for it. I very much believe in the flexibility and adaptability of language!
That said, if a tool is helpful to you, you should use it. No one knows your needs the way you do. Just-- maybe don't take its word as law, that's all.
After using it for about a week, I agree with you. I’m about 5 chapters into my latest novel and I find it too restrictive. I end up refusing most of the suggestions, especially in dialogue sections. As far as it finding simple errors (spelling, missing word, etc) it is excellent. Thx for responding, have a good day.